Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ultimate-blocks domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Have You Heard of Betteridge's Law of Headlines? - 11 Points

The unique and extremely popular [citation needed] authority on pop culture since 2008

last updated on

written by Sam Greenspan

Let’s discuss a tongue-in-cheek law and then PARADOX IT TO DEATH.

Bettridge’s Law of Headlines is one of those tongue-in-cheek life aphorisms like Murphy’s Law or the Streisand Effect. It states: “Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered with the word ‘No.'”

Questions in headlines have historically been frowned upon — at least until clickbait was invented, they became a necessity to compete. Now every website uses them; still frowned upon, now just mainstream. Like the use of “irregardless.” Or people openly discussing their “brand.”

Bettridge’s Law is a reminder and a subtle omnipotent judgment, reminding quality writers to craft quality headlines. After all, if you ask a question in a headline and the reader’s answer is instinctively “no,” your article is thereby rendered useless.

I’ve certainly fallen victim. I’ve pumped out such articles as:

Are You Taller Than the Average Person in the World?

Did I Subtly Name My Kid After a Simpsons Character?

Four Philosophy Professors Got Feces in the Mail — Is a Rival Professor to Blame?

Was Good Burger Accidentally the First Anti-GMO Movie?

This Is the Ugliest College T-Shirt in Existence — Should I Buy It?

Is the Solution to Internet Comments to Charge People to Make Them?

Is Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Secretly a Sexist Term?

I caught a LOT of “NOs” on social media over that last one.

Am I ashamed? (No.) Wow, it works.

Well, maybe. Blogging is a different animal with a different set of mores. It’s a medium that requires a direct action (a click) to earn a reader. Compared to a newspaper, when the headline’s job is to inform and the reader’s only required action is slightly shifting the position of their pupils, headlines take on a monumentally different sense of import.

Plus headlines have evolved so much — to the point where Facebook was overrun a few years ago with the Upworthy-style “He Thought the Woman Was a Turtle, But Watch This Video. 19 Seconds In, Wow. I’m Crying” — that questions are almost an oasis. From a trusted website, they might even be an indication that you’re going to read something surprising, enlightening and well-reasoned.

But that’s not really why I’m writing this. No, I’m here because I just beat Bettridge’s Law of Headlines.

How? Read the headline of this post.

Now try to follow the Law.

BOOM. WarGames computer status: Destroyed.

Ahem.

For reference, I’ve been sick all week.